Dialectics

Dialectics has been considered as star of the three original liberal arts known to spotless philosophers as the Trivium, with the early(a) ii as rhetoric and grammar Dialectics Dialectics has been considered as iodin of the three original liberal arts known to classical thinkers as the Trivium, with the otherwise both as rhetoric and grammar. During the ancient times in Greece, dialectics forte was at the affairs of persuasion, very much like its child counterpart rhetoric. Dialectics purpose was to resolve discrepancies and disagreements through logical and rational discourses.The straightforward approach and explanation to how dialectics work is through the three step demonstrate of thesis-antithesis-synthesis, which was postulated by a German idealist philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel. He identified that for which, grade a given premise, would be the emergence of a proposition (the theses) nonwithstanding later to be refuted (hence the anti-thesis of it) . Being in this posit of unacceptability, the only resource is to arrive at a higher(prenominal) intelligence or disaffirmation of the supposed presupposition of the thesis and anti-thesis forming a third proposition termed as the synthesis.A much simple and un-Hegelian example to understand dialectics is, lets suppose you just got a consecrate of a brand in the buff cell yell. Being new to you, you suck a limited understanding of it. You start on a state of ignorance knowing that its only purpose or the only reason for having one is to en subject you to communicate. (thesis) Sooner or later, one way or another, the batteries ordain run out(assuming it is not a solar powered device) and it will foreswear functioning, hence the opposite of communicating or not being able to communicate. anti-thesis)Only then when you choose a deeper understanding that for a cell phone to work and operate it get hold ofs a power source and encyclopedism the concept of recharging/changin g the power source(a synthesis is r distributivelyed and you gain a higher knowledge about the cell phone)will you get it to function properly again. Frederick Engels and Karl Marx, two very well-known revolutionary thinkers during their time applied this philosophical sentiment in studying the ideal and material condition of the population.It has been the theoretical unveiling of Marxism which led to the development of dialectic materialism, which is simply the combination of Hegels theory of Dialectics and materialism and Historical Materialism, the application of dialectic materialism in studying history. The number 1 prescript of dialectics according to Frederick Engels is that everything, be it physical and material objects to real world processes, is made of opposing forces or opposing sides. (Fleck) To elaborate on this principle just look at everything around you.Everything works like a magnet. Objects hold each other beca make use of of the opposing forces that keep them from flying separately. The check you sit on tries to break away from the earth, but the planets gravity keeps it from doing so, the fair weather is held together by gravity which counteracts the nuclear reaction from its core. Even plain abstract concepts atomic number 18 made of opposites. For instance, to have an idea of the concept of bad, we need an idea of what is good, to have an idea of what is hot, we need an idea of what is cold and so forth.This is what Engel called the interpenetration of opposites which he frequently referred to as the unity of opposites. Many critics have argued on this property of dialectics which up to until now, many thinkers, new and old identical have yet to settle. Another important principle of dialectics that Engel stated in his work about dialectics is that in everything, gradual changes lead to turning signals. (Fleck) What happens is that the two opposing forces in a process of change push against each other. Change would be gradua l if one side is stronger than the other one.But when the other side becomes stronger, there is a turning point, much like when overly much trees is cut down in a mountain slope, a mud slide occurs (turning point), you heat a kernel of corn until it turns into popcorn (turning point). This is what Engel referred to as the principle of the transformation of quantity into quality. Quantitative change results from the staunch but continuous dominance of one opposing side or force. Things then follow a qualitative change when the other or opposite side dominates the other.The third principle of dialectics is that changes moves in spirals, not circles. (Fleck) almost us processes of change are circular in the sense that at graduation, one side dominates, then the other as in the troll of day and night, breathing in and breathing out, one opposite then another. Engels claims things turn in cycles. However, it is not indispensable that they would return to where they came from and ho w they started. It is therefore cyclical but not circular. Change is ever-changing, moving in spirals.This principle is referred to by Engels as the law of negation of negation. This seemingly complex principle, according to Engel goes on and on in everyday life. This happens when one side overpowers the other making the first negation. The dominated side then overpowers the dominating side at slightly point making the second negation. This is what law of negation of negation explains. In real-life drama, dialectics play a crucial role, in communication specifically in day-to-day conventionality conversations more than we ought to think.Traditionally, dialectics has been considered as a linguistic process that leads to generation of new ideas and thought by ones apprehension of a contradiction and paradox amidst two or more opposites. It laymans term, a conversation starts with stating a point of view followed by the others verification of its validity or questioning it from othe r points of view. In this whole conversation process, the clash of ideas or propositions trying to compass a consensual agreement which in turn is still lastly questioned from other perspectives.Much like dialectics, in dialogues there is an imminent clash of ideas that are going on between individuals which ultimately lead to a consensus. The use of the dialectical approach or method in analyzing our history has desire been used by its pioneer thinkers, more notable in arts, philosophy, scientific discipline and religion. This may have been due to the analytical and critical capability of dialectics in explaining why and how changes occur which is essential for historians in probing the past.By pinpointing what stream of thinking and clashing ideas during a particular epoch, much can be surmised to sagely presuppose what will would or could happen next. Dialectics is essential in understanding fully the hows and the whys of how things happen. It provides the tool that gives wisd om on knowing the factors of change in a society and how it is ultimately molded and formed. Another concept that is famous in the field of dialectics is called the principal contradiction, termed by Mao Zedong.This is defined as the contradiction in all things that needs to be heady first and foremost. In determining what the principal contradiction in a thing, it is necessary to look at the overall or main refinement of it. The three principle of dialectics namely. (1)the unity of opposites,(2)quantity into quality, and (3)negation of negation fits clearly on how to identify and possibly solve the principal contradiction in our society though it does not give a clear blueprint on what should be done.