Food, Inc. Essay

Food, Inc. broadens the consumers prospective on the production of viandss such as chicken and cattle. The documentary was convincing in regards to cover the consumer what manufacturers ar afraid to show us, consumers. Nowadays, there ar approximately 47 thousand products in a grocery store. That of which four producers become 70% of the market. Food, Inc. had many facts and statistics telling the viewers of todays husbandmans and former(a) salient corporations in the food industry. It used to be that it took three months to produce a chicken from when it hatched to the time it was ready to slaughter, now, it takes only 48 days.Farmers sightly a borrowing of $500,000 in which they only make $18,000 profit. Large producers are keeping farmers in debt. Rather than letting the plants and animals take the time they take on to produce naturally companies are incessantly thinking faster, faster, bigger, bigger. Candy, chips, pop, and hamburgers from McDonalds are all examples o f cheaper food than compared to vegetables or fruit. Although they are higher subsidized, they are low in cost. Food, Inc. could have overlooked the value some Ameri shadowers have on these cheaper meals. A Hispanic family was shown on the documentary.This family was faced with having to choose between buying medication for their diabetic father or getting groceries. Him, as fountainhead as one and a half million other Mexican farmers lost their jobs due to larger corporations and with all the debt that is due, they dont have a lot of money for the quality of food they may want. Food, Inc. however did overemphasize all the negative larger companies were doing to farmers, as well as animals. Some interesting facts are as follow at a slaughter house located in Tar Heel, 32,000 pigs are slaughter a day thats 2,000 per hour.If a plant is always failing the USDA testing, they are said to be shut down. However, the rightfulness never took affect, instead, the plants took USDA to court. In 2008, 90% of soybeans did not have the sea captain seed. Although documentaries are usually biased, there were many times through with(predicate)out the strike where a large corporations were asked to talk, however, they declined. Large corporations could have helped their side of view by taking time to conduct an interview with the Food, Inc. crew.Food, Inc.was very intriguing, although it could have furthered explained through a corporations prospective overall the documentary was successful. The harsh facts with the jaw move graphics were just a bonus on the heart tactual sensation stories all of the farmers told. The graphics of reality was most bothering. The fact that companies could get by with employing illegal immigrants than do nothing when they were arrested was annoying, as well as discerning that a company could sue anybody for anything even if they knew they would lose.Something that was realized as contribute from watching this piece, is that to eat well in this country you need money. Questions that could be asked are how can companies like Monsanto have all of one farmers bank accounts and check written from the last 10 years. How can this company sue farmers (and win) for the farmers crops being contaminated against their knowledge. wherefore did patenting a seed ever become acceptable when the seed inevitably to be grown and consumed by millions. And why can the FDA sell food without a GMO label.